Greetings from Shanghai!

I am writing to you from China’s largest city, home to more than 24 million people, Shanghai.  The weather here is wet and cold (10oC) today – much like home – but it is also changeable too.  Tomorrow it may be warm and sunny!  The city is located on China’s central coast, making seafood especially popular here.  At eight hours ahead, it is now bed-time in Shanghai but you will just be sitting down to lunch.

tomphoto2

We arrived on Sunday 6th November, after a 15 hour flight, including an unscheduled landing in Beijing for 4 hours due to heavy fog in Shanghai.  It was a long and tiring journey but one worth making: I have learnt a great deal already!

I am here with 69 other teachers from the UK, representing our government, to learn more about how schools in Shanghai teach maths.  For many years now, Shanghai has been globally recognised as the world’s leading jurisdiction in maths teaching. So we want to know more about what makes their lessons so fun and memorable.  However, this is a two-way exchange.  Shanghai teachers are also keen to learn about schools back in England, they are very interested in our Computing and PE lessons in particular.  

St Joseph’s is very lucky because we will be welcoming two teachers from Shanghai back to our school at the end of November.  Miss Zhao (pronounced “J-oaw”) who will be teaching in Year 6 and Mr Jiang (pronounced “J-ong”) who will be working in Year 2.  We are only of only 35 schools in the country to receive this great honour and I am very much looking forward to introducing them to you.

shanghai-group

Monday 7th November 2016
The Welcoming Ceremony

On Monday we were officially welcomed to the city by some important men from the Education Ministry of China.  They explained that children in China don’t start school until the age of seven, which is very different to England.  They went on to describe how most primary schools in Shanghai have between 1-2 thousand pupils (very large by our standards).  Interestingly, lessons in Shanghai tend to be 35 minutes long, which is short compared to ours, but children have eight separate lessons every day.  

The Minister of State for Education also explained that teaching is seen as a very noble/profound career choice.  He said, “Teachers engineer the soul.”   In response, the universities in Shanghai have departments dedicated to the “cultivation” of teaching pedagogy.  It has been long established that lessons must be “meticulously crafted” in order to impart knowledge effectively, ensuring no misconception is left to chance.  They are preempted and built into lesson structures.  Therefore, teachers must not work in isolation but develop lessons very carefully in collaboration with their peers.  Teachers here use carefully designed textbooks (nationally adopted) to support their learning journeys and ensure they only ever take small, considered steps when introducing new learning. Having such large schools allows teachers to share expertise and affords them time to focus on the tiniest aspect of a lesson’s design.  

Clare Fowler, the DfE’s head of maths policy, got a knowing look from the seventy teachers in the room when the Minister of State explained that the Shanghai education policy hasn’t fundamentally changed in 30 years!  He described how the city’s on-going five year education plan is intended to make small changes but not too much and not too quickly.  He said, “Don’t not change, but don’t change too much.  Rome wasn’t built in a day but don’t knock down what you’ve built – just refine it.”  

One of the city’s recent policy changes was the introduction of the title, “Professor Teacher” which recognises those teachers who have made a significant contribution to the practice and philosophy of their colleagues.  In China, teacher progression is marked by different teacher titles: Junior, Senior, Master and Professor.  They are awarded these titles based on the number of hours of professional development undertaken and the number of teacher research groups contributed to.  Successful teachers here are researchers, who observe and reflect on what makes learning successful.  When discussing a lesson, there are no judgements or standards, groups of teachers (between 5 – 30 at one time) discuss the questions and activities used and which had the greatest impact on learning.  There is no Ofsted equivalent and no lesson judgements!

Teachers in Shanghai, even in primary school, teach only one subject.  Miss Zhao and Mr Jiang are primary maths teachers. They teach 1 – 2 maths lessons each day and spend the rest of their time catching up with children who need more help, watching other teachers’ lessons and planning and preparing their wonderful activities for the next day.


We also listened to a fascinating lecture from Professor Gu, lovingly known here as, “The Father of Maths Education” because he founded the idea of variation – over thirty years ago.  Variation is a way of learning about maths by looking at one topic from lots of different perspectives – this helps children to master each topic before moving on to something more challenging.

Professor Gu also explained that it isn’t about just one lesson, it is about a series of carefully crafted sessions that are taught in a coherent fashion.  The series of sessions helps to build connections because tiny steps in learning give children more confidence and depth before they approach the most challenging part of the topic.  E.g.  When preparing for long division, children spend five or six sessions looking at how numbers can be partitioned and divided (the distributive law) in order to understand how the long division algorithm works.  So 72 divided by 4 = (40 divided by 4) + (32 divided by 4).  

It did lead me to think that perhaps, unwittingly, we take much bigger steps in a series of lessons than we ought too.  We need to be more knowledgeable about the tiny, deeper steps that contribute to understanding the larger objectives in our national curriculum.  Teacher subject knowledge leads to more effective planning and preparation.  I then stopped thinking to enjoy lunch.

Tuesday 8th November 2016
Aiju Primary School – Shanghai

Aiju is a “small” primary school (with 1,100 students) that specialises in expressive arts i.e. music, dance and art.  Parents send their children to this school if they want them to study these creative subjects and have the opportunity to participate in performance activities at a local and national level.  The school building is vibrant and inspiring – with children’s artwork on display in the main lobby.  

There are forty children in each class and they all sit at individual tables, arranged in pairs, facing the teacher.  There is no carpet work in Shanghai.  The children greet and bow to the teacher before starting the lesson – this sign of respect shows that children understand the status of the teacher and the need to pay careful attention to the following lesson.

However, that doesn’t mean that lessons in Shanghai are quiet; far from it!  I observed one lesson about classifying a collection of shapes.  It was taught to Grade 1 (our Year 3).  The children were talking about and moving the shapes around – discussing and debating with their partner the best way to categorise the shapes: by shape, by colour or by size.  The teacher then asked children to share and compare their ideas before teaching them how to classify groups of objects in different ways at the same time, like in my diagrams.  Using the diagrams, children explored the different ways shapes can be grouped.  They used their new understanding about the layout of groups to identify missing shapes in the teacher’s “Who’s missing?” game.  

Although I began the lesson by wondering how this could possibly be classed as geometry, there was no discussion about sides and corners, it was later explained to me that this is in fact a first look at statistics!  Children know what squares, triangles and circles are, they were looking at how to represent classification and how to show different categories in charts and diagrams.  It struck me that the array diagram is intrinsically linked to the skill of reading axes on graphs and recognising two variables.  It was remarkably subtle but will help children much later on to read more complex charts and graphs if they begin representing simple categories in this way now.  

The classroom we watched the lesson in is three times the size of a standard classroom and two thirds is given over to seating for teacher observers! – The science of teaching is alive in Shanghai.

After school was a chance to enjoy some sightseeing…

Wednesday 9th November 2016

Another inspiring maths lesson today.  Grade 3 (our Year 5) had been preparing for long division this week and Miss Lee, their teacher, wanted us to see the first written method lesson because it is a very tricky one to teach.  I was pleased that she chose it because it is one skill that many children in England find challenging too.

tomphoto1

A young boy called Lucas showed me how they had been preparing in the days before by using their knowledge of times tables to help understand the distributive law more deeply e.g. 72 ➗ 4 =40 ➗ 4 + 32 ➗ 4.  This is important in order to understand what all the digits in a long division calculation actually mean…

Again, I was astounded by the importance of knowing the steps that come before a procedure deeply myself.  Without a profound knowledge of how to build up to an efficient method, we cannot help children to understand the meaning of the calculation they are doing.  If it is treated merely as a procedure, some children can quickly grasp it but not understand it whilst others struggle to remember all the steps in the correct order.  However, by spending quality time preparing the “anchoring knowledge” beforehand, the procedure is easier to remember because children understand what it means, and they are more likely to be accurate because they appreciate the value of the digits used to make the procedure efficient.  A very eye-opening experience!

A couple of important observations: in Shanghai, all teachers and all students write the written method in exactly the same way, even down the the nuances of how they draw the symbol.  It is this strength of coherence that makes the whole system so effective and ensures that misconceptions and miscommunications are less likely to occur in the first instance.  It was also refreshing to see Miss Lee invite us to the hardest lesson to teach – she wanted our help identifying exactly which questions and activities were effective.  She wanted to unpick the examples with us to see if there was a better way of presenting and explaining them to the children.  We did not judge the lesson; we discussed the learning.

Thursday 10th November 2016
Another remarkable morning of maths observations!  We began in Grade 2 (Year 4) as they prepare for the formal written method of short multiplication.  They began by chanting their times tables, led by a class prefect as they clapped and sang.  It was a very inspiring sight.  The teacher, Miss Daisy, then reviewed with children how to use a simple picture problem (5 groups of four apples) to write a multiplication sentence – agree with children that, “4 is the value of each group, 5 is the number of groups – five groups of four apples equals 20 apples.”

Miss Daisy then very cleverly helped children to recognise the multiplicative relationships in this picture…
tom-photo4

5 X 4 + 3 X 4 = 8 X 4 = 32.  She reviewed again with children what each number actually means – “What does the 5 mean?  What does each 3 stand for?  Why isn’t it 8 x 8?”

Next, Miss Daisy shared with children this image and ask them to write down everything this tells us about multiplication.  Why not try it yourself?

Some of the children’s answers included:

2 X 8 + 1 X 8 = 3 X 8 = 24

4 X 4 + 2 X 4 = 6 X 4 = 24


Finally, Miss Daisy asked children to think and write about these two examples…tomphoto5

2 x 5 + 5 x 7 =

and

5 x 8 + 8 =

Have a think about them yourself.  Did you recognise these links?

2 x 5 + 5 x 7 = 9 x 5

and

5 x 8 + 8 = 5 x 8 + 1 x 8 = 6 x 8

 

Notice that Miss Daisy wasn’t interested in the answer to the calculation, she wanted to know what other links and connections could be made from these questions.  

tom-photo5Some reflections on this lesson:  Firstly, WOW! – It was inspiring that, even in Chinese, this lesson was so carefully prepared and clearly delivered that I could confidently understand every step.  Secondly, it is clear that teachers need to understand a great deal about the maths that comes before written methods in order to help children master written methods too.  Thirdly, one child in the lesson was clearly confident and answered each question very quickly (and accurately).  However, the teacher was not concerned about this, she simply prompted him to keep looking and think even more deeply about the relationships in the very same questions.  She did not provided anything different or harder.  The boy was genuinely gifted but he wasn’t bored, he was enjoying looking for even more connections and relationships in these tasks.  It brought to mind a phrase I heard on my training last year, “A child can be clever or bored, but they can’t be both.”

After a short break, we observed Miss Zhao teach a lesson to Grade 4 (Year 6) on the laws of the operations (commutative, associative and distributive – look them up if they are not familiar, it is utterly fascinating!)  To begin, Miss Zhao reviewed some homeworks the children had prepared as part of their revision of these rules, which they already knew.  Some examples are below…

tomphoto7I was struck by how colourful and personal they were.  We often have a preconceived idea of education in Asian jurisdictions as being rote and involving endless practice.  This is not the case here in Shanghai.  Children are allowed to make their work bright and bold, in order to emphasise meaning and help them remember important facts.

Surprisingly, Miss Zhao praised homeworks that were concise. She did not want endless details and examples about the laws of the operations, she liked the homeworks that chose the one best example and the most precise notes.  She told some children that they were doing too much!  

Next, she challenged children to apply their understanding of these laws to very complex calculations.  She did not want to know the answers to the calculations, she wanted children to show how the laws could make the calculations easier to answer.  
A brief reflection: shocking to see how effective a truly deep appreciation of maths can be.  Children in China don’t start school until the age of 7 (our Year 3).  They begin by learning numbers 0 – 10 and counting.  So lessons in Grades 1, 2 and 3 often appear far simpler than ours.  However, because the maths curriculum is so carefully designed, children are constantly making links and connections in everything they do, so by Grade 4 (Year 6) all children are working confidently with more complex ideas and their understanding of maths is deeper.  They quickly then overtake our curriculum and can start to answer very complex puzzles independently by age 12 – puzzles more akin to GCSE work in our country.  

tomphoto10Our afternoon involved a traditional Chinese painting lesson – using watered ink on blotting paper to create different tones and effects.  The theme was hedgehogs!  We also enjoyed learning to use the four traditional Chinese string instruments: the erhu, the pipa. the guzheng and the dulcimer.  The sounds of these instruments is very soothing and peaceful – the strings make a harmonious sound that is easy to listen to.

tomphoto9    tomphoto11

Friday 11th November 2016
Our last day at Aiju Primary school – very sad to leave having made such good friends with Miss Zhao and Miss Daisy.  They invited us to watch the morning exercise routine.  This is an activity that the children do every single morning: 8:15 – 8:30am.

tomphoto12tomphoto13

It was amazing to see all the children moving in unison as they followed the routine. 1,100 children all exercising together on a single playground!  However, it wasn’t led by a teacher, it was lead by the children themselves.  A very impressive sight!

Our first lesson today was with Grade 1.  They were learning about the relationships between parts and wholes, using addition and subtraction sentences to express the different things we know about how three numbers can work together.  

tomphoto14

Miss Daisy then used variation to help children understand this relationship more deeply – testing them to see if they knew when the relationship wasn’t being expressed correctly and using missing digit problems to encourage children to reason about what might be missing and why.
tomphoto15

Finally, she challenged children with a problem to see if they could pull out of a selection of numbers all the relationships that existed within them.  Children had good fun finding, expressing and discussing these relationships.  Why not have a go at finding all the number sentences within them too?

You might be surprised to hear that lessons here are very lively – children have many opportunities to talk about and debate their understanding.  Very often children will lead their peers in the role of the “Little Teacher” and when a child says something worthy of praise, all the children clap and cheer their understanding.  They celebrate their learning.  It is a truly lovely and wholesome atmosphere.  

It is true that parents here “hothouse” their children – giving them many hours of extra homework to ensure they never fall behind. Nevertheless, the teachers don’t see this as healthy of beneficial.  Miss Zhao explained, “They learn some things outside of school and they think our lessons are sometimes easy.  However, they have not learnt the true knowledge outside of school – there is still far more to learn about my lessons.  What children do outside of school is not important, it is not the true knowledge.  Only I can give them the true knowledge and then they will understand properly.  So if a child tells me, “This is easy.”  I will give him a very difficult question to show him that he does not really understand.  Then he will see that he does not understand and so he must pay closer attention to my lesson.”

Saturday 12th November 2016


tomphoto16
A wonderful day’s sightseeing in the city.  We were kindly hosted by our Shanghai colleagues who were eager to show off the city’s culture and history.  Starting at the newly refurbished Natural History Museum, we made our way through thousands of years of evolution as we examined how livings things have changed in our world since the dawn of time itself.

Moving across the city, we stopped of at a Buddhist Temple to learn more about the religion and culture of the Chinese people. Buddhism is the most popular religion in China; some people describe it as a way of life, rather than a religion.  At it’s heart, Buddhism recognises that in order to live a happy and prosperous life, one needs to learn how to be content and peaceful in your own life first.  The temple itself is a stunningly beautiful yet simple building – a peaceful haven away from the hustle and bustle of the city.

tomphoto17        tomphoto19

Finally, as day turned to night, we enjoyed a river cruise before sampling some of the most unusual and mouth-watering delicacies that Shanghai has to offer.  Deep fried bean curd being a particular favourite with the locals!

Monday 14th November 2016

tomphoto20Our first morning at Xiangyang Primary school.  Mr Jiang took us on a tour of the school, which is a bright, colourful building.  There is a Duplo Wall for children to play with and be creative at break times and they have special classrooms for music, art and science.

The outside of the building is decorated in an extensive mosaic that the children themselves designed many years ago.  Xiangyang (pronounced “Shung-yang”) is a very large primary school with over 1,800 students and eight classes in each year group!  Their football teams are famous in the city as the current champions and everyone is very proud of them.  Any child who does not work hard and complete their homework is not allowed to represent the school at football!

tomphoto18

You will be fascinated to learn that children in Shanghai run down the corridors and play in the stairwells.  Their free time is their own and they are allowed to roam the school as they wish.  They have eight 35 minute lessons each day and these are split up by 8-10mins break between them plus one hour for lunch.  Children have a meal delivered to their classroom and they are expected to eat and clean up after themselves.  They do not have a strict uniform policy and teachers themselves dress very informally.  It is believed that you must be comfortable in order to learn (and teach) well.  

All classrooms in all schools have a very similar standard of equipment: some form of projection screen, a top of the range visualiser, PPT is the preferred software for most teachers and there is abundant white/blackboard space.  The set-up in almost every classroom in the country is identical!

We were treated to a Grade 5 lesson by Miss Anne today.  She is an experienced teacher with two teenage daughters.  I was asking her about how maternity leave works in Shanghai… She explained that most mothers in the city have to got back to work: it is a very expensive place to live.  Teachers take six months off work and, when they return, grandparents take on the role of the child’s parent during the day.  This can cause all kinds of tensions at home but it is generally accepted as the norm. However, in order to support mothers back to work, the Government allows flexible working times for women who return.  For the first year after returning to work, women are entitled to a later start and earlier finish than their colleagues.  This is seen as important, especially for mothers who wish to continue breastfeeding their young child.

tomphoto21Mr Jiang invited us to observe his Grade 2 lesson, where children were learning to understand division with remainders.  He began be recapping what division actually is; the sharing or group of equal parts of a whole.  He helped children to understand that some whole numbers cannot be split into equal groups and so a remainder is left over.  However, the remainder is always smaller than the size of the group.  He showed the children how this is directly related to multiplication:

16 ÷ 5 = 3 r1      so 16 = 5 x 3 + 1

 Another example:

7 x 4 + 2 = 30 so 30 ÷  4 = 7 r2

After lunch, we joined Grade 1 for an art lesson – creating symmetrical dragon flies using folding and cutting skills.   They left me some of their work, to share with you back home, as a gift.  Everyone here is extremely kind and welcoming; they are fantastic hosts!

tomphoto22

Thursday 17th November 2016

We have continued to observe and be inspired by some fantastic maths teaching this week. In this Grade 1 lesson, children were looking at addition by bridging ten. I was amazed at how clearly the teacher helped children to recognise the need to use bonds to ten to help find the solution.

Children are very good at recognising the value of numbers to ten here – just looking through their textbook it is clear that the very first thing they do in school is learn about the value of number. By recognising that, for example, five is the whole and the whole is made from 5 + 0, 4 +1 and 3 + 2 etc, children can use their prior learning to answer questions like 9 + 5 with ease.

The teachers here use a selection of carefully crafted diagrams and number sentences to help children see how to break the smaller number into parts and then annotate their calculations to help demonstrate their thinking.

Once they have understood the concept deeply, they are ready to answer more challenging and complex questions with ease.

Without doubt, well thought out textbooks are used consistently here to ensure that every child receives exposure to the most valuable questions and to help every teacher to recognise the tiny steps that are needed to build up to a more complex calculation. I have purchased some while out here (they’re only £1 each!) so that you can see what I mean.

Another interesting observation is the design of the lesson structure out here. Almost without fail, there is a simple pattern to how a 35 minute lesson is delivered:

Stage 1: Quick rehearsal of basic number facts (usual child-led) before the lesson begins – it’s used as a kind of transition/settling activity.

Stage 2: Review a mathematical concept that children already know deeply – build their confidence and set the baseline by ensuring that all children are starting from the same point.

Stage 3: Give children a feeling of the new concept (which is related to stage 2 but take the children a step further). Allow them to discuss and solve the problem in their own way, without explicitly teaching them anything yet.

Stage 4: Draw together the children’s observations and solutions to teach them and generalise about the new learning. Giving them further examples to help make links.

Stage 5: Use carefully prepared variation questions to support children in making the generalised principle stronger and take it deeper still.

Stage 6: Summarise the understanding gained by reviewing and marking the questions answered.

Stage 7: Take a break.

Stage 8: Rehearse the skill again to consolidate it, as a homework task.

Friday 18th November 2016

What a remarkable couple of weeks! With mixed feelings, it’s time to return home.

Tom Collins from St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School in Guildford and Nicci Bailey from Hook Junior School have been selected to take part in a prestigious teacher exchange, focusing on mathematics,  with a partner school in Shanghai.

Tom and Nicci are among 70 expert mathematics teachers from schools across England taking part in an exchange as part of the Maths Hubs programme. St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School and Hook Junior School are working with the Surrey Plus Maths Hub.

The purpose of the exchange is to further develop the understanding and implementation of mastery approaches to teaching maths in St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School and  Hook Junior School, and in local partner schools that Tom and Nicci will be working with during the school year 2016-17.

This is one part of the Teaching for Mastery Programme, run by the National Centre for Excellence in the Teaching of Mathematics (NCETM) in conjunction with the Maths Hubs programme.

In July this year, the School Standards Minister, Nick Gibb, announced £41m of funding for the Teaching for Mastery programme over the next four school years.

The group of teachers, all of whom completed the Mastery Specialists programme within their Maths Hubs last year, will be visiting Shanghai in the first half of November this year, and hosting their partner teachers from Shanghai in English schools in late November/early December.

This is the third teacher exchange with schools in Shanghai since the Maths Hubs programme was launched in autumn 2014.

The teaching for mastery programme in primary schools in England is to be significantly expanded over the next four years with £41 million of new funding from the Department for Education (DfE).

The announcement was made by the Schools Minister Nick Gibb at the annual conference of the Advisory Committee on Mathematics Education (ACME) in London today (12 July 2016).

The money, channelled through the 35 Maths Hubs in England, will fund four further years of the Mastery Specialists programme, which began last September, and in which 140 experienced primary teachers have engaged in professional development activities to become expert in mastery approaches to teaching mathematics.

Thanks to the new funding, every year from autumn 2016 onwards, a further 140 teachers will undergo a year of development as Mastery Specialists and, once established, continue to be funded to lead professional development groups of teachers from neighbouring schools. In this way, by summer 2020, a total of 700 Mastery Specialists will be trained, and teachers from 8,400 schools will also have received training in teaching for mastery approaches.

The funding will also help schools participating in the programme pay for textbooks consistent with teaching for mastery approaches. Examples of such textbooks have been used for two years by teachers taking part in a Maths Hubs project, and found to be of significant support in designing lessons and in helping pupils develop deep understanding of mathematical concepts.

Commenting on the funding announcement, the NCETM Director, Charlie Stripp, said:

‘This will give significant new momentum to the existing work around teaching for mastery in primary schools. The 140 Mastery Specialist teachers who are now completing their development year have already had a positive impact on pupils in their own schools and on teachers in neighbouring schools. Expanding the programme for a further four years is wonderful news for maths education.’

‘Contrary to some reports, teaching maths for mastery is not about rote learning and drilling, though it certainly does result in pupils knowing and being able to recall times tables and other key number facts, which represent an important foundation for learning and using maths. Teaching for mastery focuses on deep conceptual learning, developing secure foundations that pupils can build on throughout their education.’

The Maths Hubs programme is led by the NCETM and funded by the DfE.

Breakdown of funding and timeline for schools’ involvement

There are three broad strands to the DfE funding announced on 12 July.

  • Continuing to train primary teachers as Mastery Specialists, and equip them to pass on their expertise to teachers and schools in their areas. So far 140 Mastery Specialists have already been trained. Over the next four school years, starting in September 2016, a further 560 will be trained.
  • Funding teachers and schools to join Work Groups, led by Mastery Specialists, with the aim of spreading knowledge, experience and expertise about mastery approaches widely across the school landscape. The first 840 of these schools will join such Work Groups in the school year starting in September 2016. In subsequent years the numbers of schools participating in this way will rise sharply, reaching a total figure of around 8,000 by school year 2019-2020.
  • Subsidising schools participating in the above Work Groups to buy textbooks—for use by teachers in lesson preparation and pupils during lessons.

Details of how these three areas of activity and funding will be managed and allocated are currently being finalised. However,all teachers and schools participating in this programme, either as Mastery Specialists or in Work Groups, in the coming school year (2016-2017) have already been selected.

Details of how schools and teachers can get involved in years 2017-2018 onwards will be published in the 2016 autumn term.

Meanwhile, alongside this funded programme, Maths Hubs and the NCETM will continue to make available, freely accessible to all schools, materials, guidance, information and case studies about teaching for mastery.

Mastery Specialists 2

Each of the 35 Maths Hubs have appointed 4 Primary teachers to become Primary Mastery Specialists.

Mastery Specialists 1The Mastery Specialists have all attended 3 residential training courses, run by the NCETM, during which they spent time unpicking what ‘Mastery’ means and looks like in practice. They have not only received excellent training on Teaching for Mastery but have now spent almost a whole year developing their own practice in the classroom using the ‘5 big ideas’ shown below. Central to these 5 elements is promoting the importance of making connections, not just within a series of questions, but across topics in Maths.

In the Surrey Plus Maths Hub, the Mastery Specialists are:

  • Jo Cullen – St Joseph’s Primary, Epsom
  • Tom Collins – St Joseph’s Primary, Guildford
  • Nicola Richards – Hook Junior School, Hook
  • Katie Breese – Kenyngton Manor, Sunbury

Mastery Specialists 3

Map: Blue stars shows the location of the 4 PMSTs, Red pins shows the location of the schools currently involved in TRGs

Each Mastery Specialist is currently running a set of TRG’s (Teacher Research Groups) with approx 12 teachers from 6 other schools. These meet once a half term and usually consist of:

1.Initial discussion of a lesson plan, specifically looking at pedagogy, questioning, variation etc.

2.Observe the learning in a lesson

3.Discussion of lesson afterwards, with emphasis on the learning observed.

These TRG’s have promoted discussion of key aspects of Teaching for Mastery, including: whole class teaching with no set differentiation/grouping; challenge through questioning and extension activities (depth not acceleration); access through pre-teach, practical resource and extra guidance.

The feedback from both participating teachers and the Mastery Specialists themselves has been extremely positive. Katie Breese, the Mastery Specialist based at Kenyngton Manor feels her teaching is still developing to include more aspects of Teaching for Mastery:

“I’ve been trying out mixed ability pairs to develop children’s discussion and reasoning – it’s made a difference already with their ability to explain their mathematical thinking.”

“The pace is much slower, and so now you can see the deeper understanding and connections being made, which before would have been skipped over.”

Mastery Specialists 2Fly the kite… and then reel them in.

This analogy has been used throughout the training received by the Primary Mastery Specialist Teachers. The idea is that you give students the opportunity to explore and develop their own ideas before pulling them back together to move forwards together as a class. For example, at the start of a lesson you might let the students explore a ‘real life’ problem that needs to be solved, give them time to develop their own ideas and then bring the class back together to teach them the skills they need to move forwards.

 

Click here to download the powerpoint from the spring conference Session 1 – Mastery Specialists